Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Thomas Fancutt vs Luke Bambridge Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fancutt vs Bambridge analysis and find out who is favored!
Thomas Fancutt vs Luke Bambridge Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fancutt 1 - 0 Bambridge
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fancutt has won 49.51% of points on their second serve, while Bambridge has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fancutt, in recent form, has won 45.08% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bambridge has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.57% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fancutt has saved 52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bambridge has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fancutt has won 41.18% of matches played (W/L 14/ 20), with Bambridge winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fancutt has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 66% (W/L 19/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5). Bambridge has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 32/ 25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 9/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Fancutt has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 8/ 10), where as Bambridge has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fancutt winning 1 times and Bambridge being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Fancutt winning 2 and Bambridge winning 1. The last match between Fancutt and Bambridge was at the Aptos Challenger, 04-08-2018, Q1 round, Hard with Thomas Fancutt getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:28.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fancutt and Bambridge have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fancutt winning 1 times and Bambridge 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fancutt winning 0, and Bambridge 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fancutt has played against opponents with an average rank of 162.35 while Bambridge has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fancutt has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bambridge has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fancutt has converted 49.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bambridge has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
792
Rank
382
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
481
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
53% (228-200)
Career Total W/L
52% (176-161)
40% (6-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$4,650
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Thomas Fancutt vs Luke Bambridge For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Fancutt VS Bambridge
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Thomas Fancutt | Luke Bambridge |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 14 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 13 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:0:28 | 2:0:28 |
| 1st Serve % | 47% (47/99) | 48% (50/104) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 83% (39/47) | 70% (35/50) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (24/52) | 50% (27/54) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 17% (2/12) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (42/104) | 36% (36/99) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Luke Bambridge
47%
(
47 of
99)
1st Serve %
48%
(
50 of
104)
14
Aces
11
13
Double Faults
6
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
46%
(
24 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Thomas Fancutt | Luke Bambridge |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (13/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (148/159) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.78 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 118 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.43 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 65 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:21 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 178.2 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (527/937) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (385/527) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (203/410) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (32/65) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (325/926) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 38% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (6/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Thomas Fancutt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Fancutt
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Thomas Fancutt
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
38%
(
24 of
63)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Thomas Fancutt
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Leonid Sheyngezikht
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Etienne Niyigena
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Player
Thomas Fancutt
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
14%
(
5 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Francesco Ferrari
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thomas Fancutt
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
6
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Thomas Fancutt
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Luke Bambridge Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Luke Bambridge
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
11
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Luke Bambridge
47%
(
47 of
99)
1st Serve %
48%
(
50 of
104)
14
Aces
11
13
Double Faults
6
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
46%
(
24 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Luke Bambridge
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
22
Aces
27
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
62 of
80)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
59 of
74)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
33 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
42 of
121)
122
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Bambridge
Player
Mateusz Terczynski
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Luke Bambridge
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Escobar
Player
Luke Bambridge
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jared Hiltzik
Player
Luke Bambridge
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Bambridge
Player
Justin Boulais
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marinko Matosevic
Player
Luke Bambridge
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
46%
(
39 of
84)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Fancutt Vs Bambridge Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Fancutt are available here and Bambridge photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
